?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

What, with all these computer problems?

From scottharmon:

The Perfect Life
Your life has been 8% difficult.


Based on your family, money, political context, and personal situation -- during the important years of your development -- it appears your life was PERFECT. What does this mean?



Well, the "difficulty" of your life is a measure of how rough you had it. Relative to the world, you had a perfect childhood, with a pretty stable family and financial situation.



I'm not sure what "success" means to you, but whatever it is, you should achieve it. If you don't, it's probably out of laziness.




I have a new test! Straight males and gay/bi females, check out my brand new How Low Are Your Sex Standards Test



My test tracked 1 variable How you compared to other people your age and gender:
free online datingfree online dating
You scored higher than 0% on difficult
Link: The How Difficult Is Your Life Test written by chicken_pot_pie on Ok Cupid, home of the 32-Type Dating Test


How do those percent bars work?
I seem to get jump discontinuities on all of them.

--
Banazir

Tags:

Comments

( 8 comments — Leave a comment )
borgseawolf
Nov. 9th, 2005 10:48 am (UTC)
UP FOR EVERYTHING
You had sex with 19 out of 21!

One man's trash is guaranteed to be your treasure. You are up for EVERYTHING. A warm & wet place is all you need. Maybe not even both at once.



It's kind of gross, really, but to each his own! Your greatest gift is that you'll boldly take whatever's available to you.



The analysis: you said "no" to at most 1 woman on the exam, making you the least selective of all takers. You demonstrate almost no reservations whatsoever when it comes to sex with a woman.



Test results are categorized into 8 levels of pickiness, as the graph to the right shows. You are the #1, most slutty, test taker.



Congratulations.






My test tracked 1 variable How you compared to other people your age and gender:
free online datingfree online dating
You scored higher than 93% on tolerance
Link: The How Low Are Your Sex Standards Test written by chicken_pot_pie on OkCupid Free Online Dating, home of the 32-Type Dating Test
banazir
Nov. 9th, 2005 11:12 am (UTC)
Oh, wlel
Impossible to Please
You had sex with 1 out of 21!

You are impossible to please. You are the most selective of all female seekers, showing not even a marginal interest in marginal women. Of the 21 women I showed you, 2 or fewer were satisfactory, meaning you have extremely tight standards. It is likely that in your everyday life you're not much of a gawker or whistler, and -- I'm going out on a limb here -- you don't sleep with hookers.



Anyway, there are three different reasons why you'd score so low in my variable, "tolerance." The first: you could be unreasonably picky. It could be you need to chill out and be more forgiving of natural flaws. Or, the second: you're not too picky, but you have unusual tastes, which of course can be a blessing. (It's a blessing when you're the only one who recognizes some girl's beauty!) The third: hey, maybe you're with a friend, and you're hiding the truth about your desperation.



Test results are categorized into 8 levels of pickiness, as the graph to the right shows. You are the #1, most critical, test taker.



As an experiment, you might try the test late at night, under the influence of alcohol.






My test tracked 1 variable How you compared to other people your age and gender:
free online datingfree online dating
You scored higher than 0% on tolerance
Link: The How Low Are Your Sex Standards Test written by chicken_pot_pie on Ok Cupid, home of the 32-Type Dating Test


So which 2 weren't on your list? The last two?

The "very easy to please" gril was acksherly kinda qyoot, but it was boviously implied infantilism, which dknot float my boat.

Those had to be some of the worst photos of some of those celebrities (except for Erika Christensen).

--
Banazir
borgseawolf
Nov. 9th, 2005 11:15 am (UTC)
Re: Oh, wlel
Yeah, the last two. The two fat girls were kinda redundant, even if you're in the "you should try everything once" camp, like me :)
banazir
Nov. 9th, 2005 11:31 am (UTC)
But you said yes to one and no to the other?
IIRC, the last two were a bodybuilder in her fifties and the very fat woman in an extremely unflattering pose.

--
Banazir
borgseawolf
Nov. 9th, 2005 11:46 am (UTC)
Re: But you said yes to one and no to the other?
IIRC, that's correct. The fatties were redundant, so I chose the more acceptable one, and the old bodybuilder would be too much like having sex with Governator, which is where my yuck meter gets overloaded :)
The result text is incorrect, though.. it says I answered 'no' to "at most one"...
banazir
Nov. 9th, 2005 12:14 pm (UTC)
I notice these things
Yes, so I noticed. :-D

An extra-emphatic *GAH* to Governator sex.

--
Banazir
wudu_wasa
Nov. 9th, 2005 06:15 pm (UTC)
Suiladas nin maer meldir:: I am wudu-wasa, a pukel of the woods, which has recently befriended you. It would be rather pleasant if you were to return the gesture.(: Thúl tovon a radosídh.
banazir
Nov. 9th, 2005 06:32 pm (UTC)
Hannon le, mellon!
You're the first Druadan I have met, to my knowledge.

Done - I have added you back. Welcome! :-)

--
Banazir
( 8 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

December 2008
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

KSU Genetic and Evolutionary Computation (GEC) Lab

Teunciness

Breakfast

Science, Technology, Engineering, Math (STEM) Communities

Fresh Pages

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Naoto Kishi