Banazîr the Jedi Hobbit (banazir) wrote,
Banazîr the Jedi Hobbit
banazir

  • Mood:
  • Music:

Can u pls help me, Part 3: Natural Selection, or, Rage against the Know-Nothings

A little learning is a dangerous thing;
drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring:
there shallow draughts intoxicate the brain,
and drinking largely sobers us again.

    -Alexander Pope (1688-1744)

That's probably the most often half-quoted aphorism I've ever heard.

So, what am I going to rant about today?

Well, seeing as everyone has Intelligent Design on his or her mind these days (don't you?), I thought I would rant thusly:

  • 1. 06 Nov 2004 - Concerning creationism: If you're going to offer to teach creationism under the rubric of science, be scientific: admit scientific inquiry, state testable hypotheses, and draw sound conclusions based upon logical interpretation of facts. If you can't do such a thing, don't purport to.
    As one of my favorite professors, Gerard G. L. Meyer, said: "calling something by a name does not make it so". Saying that you have faith, an insight, or a burning in the bosom is all well and good, but by definition, that is not science. Ingenuousness is the first step towards building trust, and isn't that what faith is about? Trust?

  • 2. 06 Jun 2005 - Concerning the "dumbing down" of curricula: I'm becoming increasingly resistant to the pressure to lower my standards. From prerequisites to vocabulary to fundamental mathematical concepts (including basic lexicons and frameworks), this problem is becoming endemic. By a show of hands, is anybody else ready to say, "enough is enough"?
    Whence cometh this rant: I told my folks and my colleague Dan Andresen that while I do not feel alienated from the children of the early 1980s such as masaga and zengeneral, nor from children of the late 1980s and early 1990s, I feel increasingly alienated from people born between 1984 and 1988. I can't say why this is. This is, of course, a Broad Sweeping GeneralizationTM and there are always exceptions to such things, to paraphrase darana. However, I really do think there is something of an anti-intellectual bubble in American culture that lasts at least through those years. On the plus side, I think it's cyclic; I think such things swing back, like tie widths and skirt styles. On the minus side, I'm worried that this trend is self-perpetuating and that the energetic people aged (say) 12-16 right now will end up being pulled into the assiduous know-nothingness that seems to have swallowed some segment of their immediate elder generation. (By the way, what do you call the generations after X? I hate to use the term "Emo Generation", as it sounds so pejorative.)


Well, there you have it. This week's rant has been brought to you by a round of homework and exam grading and comparisons with the same work given out in past years. Yes, I realize this has been the lament of teachers (a group of which I consider myself a member) and adults (well, yeah, I guess) since time immemorial. Yes, kids have been whining about homework since at least Nineveh, courtesy of some dialogue wedged into clay back in someone's day. And no, we haven't seen The World go Down the Tubes yet. I'll go out on a limb, though, and say that it's in spite of "epistemallergy" rather than because of it.

--
Banazir
Tags: academia, anti-intellectualism, creationism, education, epistemallergy, evolution, science
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 7 comments