Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

In case you haven't heard about it this week, Dr. Paul Mirecki, a University of Kansas religious studies professor, has come under attack for his remarks concerning on a course on intelligent design that he offered (and withdrew under pressure).

Mirecki resigns from KU department post
By Sophia Maines
Lawrence Journal-World

Wednesday, December 7, 2005

The embattled Kansas University religious studies professor who drew ire from Christian conservatives for his derisive remarks on an online discussion board has withdrawn from his post as chair of the department.

"Professor Mirecki said he thought it appropriate to step down and did so on the recommendation of his colleagues in the department and I have accepted his resignation," said Barbara Romzek, interim dean of the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences. "This allows the department to focus on what's most important - teaching, research and service - and to minimize the distractions of the last couple of weeks."

Mirecki, a tenured professor who had planned to teach a course on intelligent design, came under fire recently when his remarks about the course and other statements made on the Internet became public.

Mirecki said the class would be a "slap" in the "big fat face" of religious fundamentalists. He later withdrew the course. And on Monday he reported to local authorities that he was beaten by two men who made reference to controversy.

Mirecki hospitalized after beating
By Ron Knox, Eric Weslander
Lawrence Journal-World

Originally published 05:37 p.m., December 5, 2005
Updated 06:31 p.m., December 5, 2005

Douglas County sheriff's deputies are investigating the reported beating of a Kansas University professor who gained recent notoriety for his Internet tirades against Christian fundamentalists.

Kansas University religious studies professor Paul Mirecki reported he was beaten by two men about 6:40 a.m. today on a roadside in rural Douglas County. In a series of interviews late this afternoon, Mirecki said the men who beat him were making references to the controversy that has propelled him into the headlines in recent weeks.

"I didn't know them, but I'm sure they knew me," he said.

Mirecki said he was driving to breakfast when he noticed the men tailgating him in a pickup truck.

"I just pulled over hoping they would pass, and then they pulled up real close behind," he said. "They got out, and I made the mistake of getting out."

He said the men beat him about the upper body with their fists, and he said he thinks they struck him with a metal object. He was treated and released at Lawrence Memorial Hospital.

"I'm mostly shaken up, and I got some bruises and sore spots," he said.

Douglas County Sheriff’s Officials are classifying the case as an aggravated battery. They wouldn’t say exactly where the incident happened, citing the ongoing investigation.

The sheriff’s department is looking for the suspects, described as two white males between ages 30 and 40, one wearing a red visor and wool gloves, and both wearing jeans. They were last seen in a large pickup truck.

Anyone with information is asked to call Crime Stoppers at 843-TIPS or the sheriff’s office at 841-0007.

Mirecki recently wrote online that he planned to teach intelligent design as mythology in an upcoming course. He wrote it would be a "nice slap" in the "big fat face" of fundamentalists.

The remarks caused an uproar, Mirecki apologized, and KU announced last week the class would be canceled.

Mirecki apology doesn’t appease critics
By Sophia Maines
Lawrence Journal-World

Wednesday, November 30, 2005

Kansas University professor Paul Mirecki’s official apology for writing an e-mail disparaging religious fundamentalists hasn’t calmed the firestorm surrounding his plans to teach intelligent design in a religious studies class.

"If a person has hate in his heart and says something hateful and later apologizes, do you think the hatred in his heart has been mended?" State Sen. Kay O’Connor, R-Olathe, said Tuesday. "I’m surprised that something more severe isn’t happening to this teacher who obviously has a hatred for Christians."

Mirecki, who plans to teach about intelligent design next semester, has been criticized for a recent e-mail he wrote in which he referred to religious fundamentalists as "fundies" and said his class would be a "slap in their big fat face."

KU on Monday released a written statement by Mirecki, chairman of KU’s religious studies department. In the statement, Mirecki said his e-mail was ill-advised.

"My words were offensive, and I apologize to all for that," he said.

The State Board of Education’s conservative majority earlier this month successfully pushed changes in the state’s public schools science standards that critique evolution.

KU approved the course for next semester, but changed its title from "Special Topics in Religion: Intelligent Design, Creationisms and other Religious Mythologies" to "Special Topics in Religion: Intelligent Design and Creationism."

A course description, reading list and syllabus are not available yet.

A second course, taught by John Hoopes, associate professor of anthropology, also is expected to discuss intelligent design. That class is planned for the fall.

Not enough

Conservative politicians said the apology and the change in the course title are small gestures.

"The integrity of university is in question right now,” said Rep. Brenda Landwehr, R-Wichita, and vice-chairwoman of the House appropriations committee. “He’s only apologizing for getting caught. He’s not apologizing for his behavior."

Landwehr said she wants Mirecki and KU Chancellor Robert Hemenway to appear before the appropriations committee to answer questions about the course.

"I don’t want to make a judgment without giving an opportunity for these individuals to respond to us," she said.

State Rep. Mary Pilcher-Cook, R-Shawnee, said the apology was a step, but KU needs to be more forthcoming in order to quell concerns.

"It wasn’t just a tongue-in-cheek kind of thing," Pilcher-Cook said of the e-mail. "It was a strategy."

State Sen. Karin Brownlee, R-Olathe, said she appreciates the university’s acknowledgment that this is a serious issue, but more needs to be done. She said KU needs to show that the course meets the standards of the university and the Kansas Board of Regents.
Online chat

Regarding the course’s name change, Brownlee said: “It’s like they’ve changed the cover of the book, but where’s the assurance that the content of the book will be different?”

‘Welcome to the fray’

As others responded to Mirecki’s apology, one KU professor said he’s seen this all too closely before.

Dennis Dailey, professor emeritus in KU’s School of Social Welfare, said he recently sent e-mails to Mirecki and Hoopes.

"My opening line was: ‘Welcome to the fray,’" Dailey said.

As Dailey watches the current controversy, he sees a battle similar to the one that enveloped him and his human sexuality course in 2003.

Dailey’s course on human sexuality spurred State Sen. Susan Wagle, R-Wichita, to voice her concerns on the floor of the Kansas Senate and to take aim at KU’s funding. An amendment, proposed by Wagle, to cut funding to the KU School of Social Welfare ultimately was vetoed by Gov. Kathleen Sebelius. But Wagle succeeded in getting another proviso attached that requires universities to submit to the Kansas Board of Regents their policies regarding guidelines for sexually explicit courses and sexual harassment.

Dailey said being at the center of such controversies can be frightening.

"These people often are politically established," he said. "They often say things that are incredibly hurtful."

The low point in his saga, Dailey said, was receiving death threats and seeing how the issue hurt his family.

Steve Case, a KU scientist who served as co-chairman of the state’s science standards curriculum revision committee, also said he was not surprised by the current ruckus.

He said intelligent design proponents want to be able to spin the information to meet their needs.

"They want control of the information," Case said. "They want control of how it’s presented. They don’t trust academics."

Dailey said it is an "obscene" idea that Mirecki would have to answer questions about his course.

"No faculty member should have to go before any government body and justify the teaching of a course," he said. "It’s called academic freedom."

Dailey also said he’s not shocked by the current controversy. It’s natural, he said.

"This is how it’s supposed to unfold," he said. "I cannot imagine that the people on the State Board of Education and others raising the issues of intelligent design and attacking science could expect that the university, among others, would stand by and take that crap," he said. "They’re going to fight back. Welcome to the fight."

Welcome to the fight, indeed. I want to go on record as concurring with Dr. Dailey. I've heard enough anti-intellectual spin and denigration of academics on the air (especially on The O'Reilly Factor), and I would like to add my voice to what I should hope is a fairly strident backlash. There's no call for this kind of ad hominem rhetoric, and implying that the man staged or exaggerated his own victimization is certainly adding insult to injury. Make no mistake: this kind of abusive, disrespectful, boorish, violent, and arrogant behavior is nothing short of profound evil, and while I have breath in my body, I will not stop saying so.

As I wrote here a few days back, and as neookami posted:
I will not stand for this
Everyone Feels This Pain
Show your support



( 16 comments — Leave a comment )
Dec. 9th, 2005 02:56 am (UTC)
Good luck.

Dec. 9th, 2005 03:08 am (UTC)
Thanks, and good luck to Mirecki
... and all of his supporters. I am emphatically not a condoner of silence concerning bullying.

Dec. 9th, 2005 03:19 am (UTC)
Re: Thanks, and good luck to Mirecki
And I am emphatically a believer in standing up for yourself and fighting back.
Dec. 9th, 2005 03:21 am (UTC)
Fighting back - hear, hear
Oh, I wish they'd try to pull some of that intimidation garbage with me.

I don't suffer fools gladly, and they might get more than they bargained for.

The operative word in peace and justice is justice.

Dec. 9th, 2005 03:59 am (UTC)
Re: Fighting back - hear, hear
Amen to that.
(Deleted comment)
Dec. 9th, 2005 03:56 am (UTC)
Isolation, good and bad
I don't imagine it would be. It isn't tolerated in places where there are just as many Christians by percentage, and more by sheer number.

Thuggery in the name of God is not godly. Full stop.

(Deleted comment)
Dec. 9th, 2005 04:52 pm (UTC)
Religious extremist-assisted suicide, or, charity begins at home
Oh, I have no doubt that there are militant extremists of many persuasions, including Islam, Judaism, and Christianity among others, who will gladly murder me for the above message.

I think the message is worth risking death for, but I personally think that we need to set our own house in order first in this case.

Charity begins at home, as they say.

Dec. 9th, 2005 04:45 am (UTC)
I agree, very scary.

On a brighter note, it's not just the colleges in New England that aren't tolerating this. I read an interesting article in the New York Times the other day regarding Intelligent Design. Even conservative colleges like Baylor and Kentucky's Georgetown College are saying no way - even to the point of distancing themselves from their church sponsors.
Dec. 9th, 2005 04:47 am (UTC)
Welcome news
Hereabouts, Intelligent Design is the New McCarthyism, religious edition.

It's actually very disturbing how totalitarian the tone of some of our state legislators has gotten.

Dec. 9th, 2005 04:00 am (UTC)
Kansas sounds scarier than I thought.
Dec. 9th, 2005 04:06 am (UTC)
Don't fear Kansas!
I'll protect you! See, I'm Lord Protector of Kansas.

Hrm, how's that work, I wonder...

(Deleted comment)
Dec. 9th, 2005 07:10 am (UTC)
This much hell...
And recently, too.

I'm quite disappointed in KU's central administration.
"Nothing to see here, people," seems to be the order of the day.
Well, no, there is something to see here; let's see it.

(disclaimer: we are KSU, not KU, not that we are entirely ID-free)
Dec. 9th, 2005 01:55 pm (UTC)

I can't get over all that...
Dec. 9th, 2005 03:31 pm (UTC)
This is simply horrendous.
Dec. 9th, 2005 04:53 pm (UTC)
Horrendous is the word for it
I don't often get depressed about living in Kansas, but if anything will do it, it's idiotic hogwash such as this.

(Deleted comment)
Dec. 10th, 2005 10:37 pm (UTC)
The age of majority is 18 in Kansas
... just as in the rest of the United States.

That means that an 18-year old can enlist and vote.

A 20-year old may not legally drink.

A 20-year old is not entrusted with available courses of certain "undesirable" ideologies, either. In the case of that human sexuality course, there is no fiscal excuse, either.

That is the greater part of the problem, IMO.

Logically, if an 18-year old is an adult, yet is not given the opportunity to make certain decisions and instead has those decisions made for him or her, then our nation (and the State of Kansas) is treating nominal adults as children. I heartily condemn such inconsistency, for which I have nothing but the utmost contempt, and call for "truth in legislation" when it comes to age-dependent measures.

( 16 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

December 2008

KSU Genetic and Evolutionary Computation (GEC) Lab



Science, Technology, Engineering, Math (STEM) Communities

Fresh Pages


Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Naoto Kishi